Thursday, May 23rd

Last update 16:36:03 Thu 02:06:52 AM EST

You are here: Opinions Editorials

Editorials

We can make a difference!

  • PDF

Safety in a free, democratic society cannot rely solely on armed security agents or gun laws. Laws require the consent of those who are governed by them, and the police cannot be everywhere all the time. Like it or not, our safety is based on an unspoken social contract.

This contract carries the implicit understanding that in exchange for living with order and safety, we give up some degree of freedom. That “freedom,” if we want to call it that, requires us to exercise control over impulses that might lead to us harming others.

For the most part, these unspoken rules have worked. We usually go about our lives without worrying if we will be attacked walking the streets, shopping, watching a movie or going to school.

The shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, serves as a pointed reminder that our social contract is breaking down. That is because the most recent shooting was not an isolated incident. Earlier this month, an armed assailant killed two people before killing himself at a shopping mall in Portland, Oregon. In July, a gunman slaughtered 12 people in a crowded movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. The list goes on and on.

Given the frequency of these attacks it is clear that they can no longer be treated as aberrations or simply explained away as actions by a deranged man who had easy access to weapons.

Of course, part of that is true. In each case, mentally ill men with easy access to semi-automatic assault rifles devised ways to take innocent lives.

That is why those who think that we can solve this problem through additional security and gun control alone are fooling themselves. Who knows when or where the next mentally ill killer will plot an attack?

We live in a violent society with far too many guns, far too much anger and way too much alienation. The real problem is that the social contract is falling apart. The bonds that should prevent individuals from harming one another have deteriorated.

If all we do to seek solutions to the threat of violence is enact increased security measures, we continue to ignore the real source of our security— civic solidarity.

Each of the assailants in these mass shootings was described as a loner. This is important to consider because human beings are inherently social beings. People need people to survive. We need contact with others to sustain ourselves and to remind us of what it means to be human.

Schools are in some ways the most important social institutions in our society.

Our schools teach our children how to be members of society, and while some of what is learned may be problematic, schools nonetheless play a vital role in a society as diverse and complex as ours. That is why when our schools are attacked and when the safety of children can no longer be taken for granted, it is devastating to the social trust that is essential to hold our society together.

We must find ways to strengthen our bonds, to increase our connections to each other, to embrace the alienated and to care for the mentally ill.

When millions of new immigrants came into our society and when America

decided to stop segregating our society by race, our schools led the way in carrying out this work. We must turn to our schools once again as we seek to find a way to restore and revitalize the bonds that protect us and should hold us together.

The solution to the increasing violence in Baltimore, in Newtown and throughout the country must be found in reaffirming our dependence on one another.

In Washington there will be new laws put on the books but in our lives, in the places where we socialize, gather and work, our task is to strengthen our communities and rebuild the social bonds that hold us together.

 

Cairo: We have a problem

  • PDF

Memo to Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi: When huge crowds of angry demonstrators are demanding your departure, tanks and soldiers are needed to protect the presidential palace, a fragmented opposition is uniting against you and high-ranking members of your government are resigning to protest your decisions, you might just be doing something wrong.

Maybe no one he listens to is giving him that advice. Or maybe he's ignoring it. But it's becoming painfully clear that instead of bringing Egypt into a bright new era, Morsi is pushing his country toward chaos. He had better reach accommodation with his opponents before the situation spirals out of control.

Nearly two years ago, Egyptians poured into the streets to protest the unchecked power of a president they saw as the enemy of democracy. Hosni Mubarak was soon forced to step down, in one of the highlights of the movement known as the Arab Spring. Today, Egypt is seeing similar complaints and unrest— this time directed against Mubarak's elected successor.

Morsi came to power honestly, narrowly winning the first real election modern Egypt has ever had. But differences over a new constitution provoked a split in the assembly assigned to draw it up. With Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood making the most of its dominant majority, more than a fourth of its members, including women and Christians, quit.

Fearful that the nation's courts would shut the assembly down, the president suddenly issued decrees barring judicial review of the assembly's work or his decisions. The drafters then rushed to finish so their new charter could go to an early vote, scheduled for this week.

Instead of advancing political and constitutional progress, Morsi provoked a backlash from Egyptians who accuse him of joining the country's long line of autocrats. By asserting such vast powers, he undermined his own legitimacy and confirmed the fears of many that the Muslim Brotherhood favors democracy only as a means to secure permanent control. That may not be the case. Egypt's Brotherhood is considered more moderate than many Islamic movements in the Middle East.

Morsi annulled a decree that gave him unfettered powers, but it is not clear that this will appease his opposition. Equally troubling is Morsi’s apparent tone deafness in dealing with many allies that have been in his corner throughout his young presidency. From various corners of the world leaders have attempted to be supportive of the new leader but are being put in a ticklish position by the appearance of the power grab. It does not bode well for future assistance and Egypt’s standing in the community of nations to see ongoing and continued unrest. Especially when that unrest appears to be spurred on by a smart elected leader who doesn’t take advice from friends and questions the motives of his perceived enemies.

However, Morsi has been given a mantle to take his country to a level of democracy not seen in generations. It has been a long time since someone started with so much promise and disappointed so many so quickly. In trying to protect Egypt's democratic revolution, he has appeared to put it in jeopardy. Unless the president continues to back off, the opposition will stay out, the economy will suffer and uncertainty will reign.

The proposed constitution leaves much to be desired as well. Like the old one, it concentrates power in the hands of the president. It leaves the military substantially free of civilian control. It offers only weak protection for freedom of the press.

It allows civilians to be tried in military courts. It incorporates a role for Islamic law that alarms secularists and Christians. The United Nations high commissioner for human rights has decried its "very worrying omissions and ambiguities.”

Egypt looks as though it is sliding toward civil war, with consequences no one can foresee. If the president is seriously prepared to retreat from his ill-considered show of power and forge a compromise with the opposition, he better do it sooner than later!

We can avoid going over fiscal cliff

  • PDF

When is a fiscal deal different from a bad compromise? When we talk about real solutions to two important and related challenges that we face— the fast approaching fiscal cliff and the even more devastating fiscal abyss that looms ahead due to our projected structural deficits.

Everyone, including President Barack Obama and members of Congress, are focused on the fiscal cliff that, unless avoided through a negotiated deal by the end of the year, will trigger dramatic spending cuts and tax increases that could render any progress made on the ailing economy useless.

Honestly, who could blame the media and many of our citizens from watching the political gamesmanship going on in Washington and shaking their heads in disgust?  It is playing out like a soap opera and a word from the wise to Congress and

President Obama: soap operas are going out of business quickly.

Avoiding the cliff must not be our only objective, not when we also face huge structural deficits and mounting debt burdens in coming years that threaten the future of our country and families. What we need to see over the next three weeks is a deal that averts the fiscal cliff and builds a bridge to achieving fiscal stability in 2013 that will help ensure we do not fall into the abyss.

Federal debt now exceeds $16 trillion but based on full and honest accounting, which includes unfunded Medicare, Social Security and other retirement obligations, the overall debt burden is at more than $71 trillion— and growing by about $100 billion a week. In other words, we are mortgaging the future of our children and grandchildren at record rates. This is not only irresponsible— it is immoral!

Congress and the White House, if they decide to be grown-ups, can solve the cliff dilemma in a way that provides a down payment toward reducing the 2013 deficit on both the spending and tax side. This can be done by both Republicans and

Democrats in a way that allows them to save face in front of the rigid partisans in both their political parties.

A solution could involve specific spending cuts, including a portion of the automatic defense and other spending cuts now in place. It could allow the payroll tax cut to expire and it could enact measures to increase the effective tax rates; reflecting the taxes that people actually pay without boosting marginal income tax rates.

Congress could also limit the tax expenditures for those above a certain level of adjusted gross income, for example $500,000— to include deductions for interest paid on a primary residence and charitable contributions.

This approach would fulfill a pledge by Democrats to raise taxes on the wealthy, and give Republicans their increase in marginal income tax rates. Everyone can be happy!

President Obama is clearly in charge of this fiscal train and he is showing little patience for anything he perceives as gimmicks from the Republicans in Congress.  He has them on the ropes and he knows it. Republicans are desperately trying to show some muscle in the wake of Obama’s election win. It’s not working.

Instead of worrying about their images, the goal should be to enact legislation that would reduce debt and slow the ridiculous spending with specific revenue increases.  If they’re smart both sides can space out these increases and cuts over the next decade and still reach their milestones.

Whoever said that our leaders were smart? We, the American people, have to be smart. We can avoid the fiscal cliff in 2012 and achieve some semblance of stability in 2013 by demanding our political leadership reach a constructive and principle-based compromise. The stakes are high and the risks very real, and yet the rewards will be great for all of us if they are successful. It’s time for results not rhetoric! 

Defending Susan Rice

  • PDF

Ambassador Rice is smart, savvy and more than qualified and capable to lead the State Department. That being said, she was ambassador to the United Nations when the tragedy in Benghazi unfolded. She had no direct role or responsibility in events leading up to, during, or immediately after the murder of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans.

In the hazy, still-developing aftermath, she was asked by her boss, the president of the United States, to do the round of Sunday shows to be the face of the Administration while the CIA and FBI were still in their initial investigatory phase.

Shame on Republicans! In particular Senator John McCain and Senator Lindsey Graham. They had the same intelligence that Ambassador Rice had that fateful Sunday. They know full well that the ambassador to the United Nations was not in the decision-making path at State or the West Wing on Benghazi. She is a loyal soldier given a mission by her Commander-in-Chief to talk about an event after the fact. 

Nothing she said or did could have prevented the terrorist attack. Just think about another smart and savvy African American woman who spoke of mushroom clouds and Weapons of Mass Destruction that helped propel a nation into war and cost the lives of thousands of Americans. And, oh yes, despite these misleading statements, McCain and Graham had no problem confirming Condoleezza Rice’s elevation to Secretary of State.

Frankly, this is a witch-hunt, pure and simple. It is as if McCain and Graham are still in the right-wing talk echo chamber about Benghazi that got Romney in trouble during the second debate. Their hateful, cynical, spiteful and hysterical attacks on a credentialed, qualified, capable, innocent African American woman of unquestioned integrity shows that the allegedly reflective post-defeat GOP is little different than the extremist party the American people soundly rejected last week.

 

What Really Matters

  • PDF

Thanksgiving for many this year may not resemble the iconic Norman Rockwell portrait. Instead, we still find ourselves with a slumping economy, unemployment in Baltimore remains stubbornly high and, although not as bad as in other states, home values in Baltimore and Prince George’s County and other jurisdictions are terribly low.

So what, exactly, is there to be thankful for? We can use these difficult times as a reminder that we are not defined by the size of our house, the make of the car in the driveway or the latest iPhone we use.  

What matters most, particularly in times of hardship, are the people in our lives, the quality of the time we can spend with them and the meaning and joy that being together can bring. And that, at its best, is what Thanksgiving is all about.

Families and friends gathered around a table, enjoying a meal, taking time to reflect on what they’re most thankful for.

America’s annual harvest festival is about the basics: the food we are lucky enough to eat, the family and friends we are lucky enough to be surrounded by, and the freedom we are lucky enough to enjoy.

Most holidays, religious or otherwise, encourage reflection and gratitude. But few of the biggies are as unencumbered and universal as Thanksgiving. There is no mass or church service to rush off to, no gifts to exchange, no religious differences to divide.

Sadly, we’ve begun to see Thanksgiving as simply the day before Black Friday and the gateway to our Christmas spending. 

We must do a better job of reminding ourselves that pilgrims came to this country to escape religious persecution and were ultimately taught to survive the harsh elements of the new world by the indigenous Indians. They broke bread together as a way to celebrate their thankfulness.

At its best, this celebration can, even for just one day, dull the pain of this never-ending economic downturn, blunt the power of American commercialism and quiet the ugliness of our growing political divide. Thanksgiving can be used as a day to remind us what really matters— and for that, we all can be thankful!