Baltimore— DLA Piper announced that Guy Flynn has been named chair of the firm’s Maryland Real Estate practice. Flynn will also become partner-in-charge of DLA Piper’s downtown Baltimore office, effective January 1, 2013.

“DLA Piper has a longstanding and well-earned reputation for excellence and leadership in commercial real estate in the Baltimore region and throughout Maryland. We will build upon that tradition as we continue to provide clients with business-minded solutions to their legal needs,” said Flynn. “I look forward to working with and growing our team of real estate lawyers and utilizing the practice’s unique breadth and depth to deliver the highest quality services.”

DLA Piper’s Maryland Real Estate practice brings to bear a multidisciplinary team of lawyers across the firm’s three Maryland offices, as well as the resources of a network of more than 550 real estate lawyers globally.

“Real estate is one of the strengths of DLA Piper and we are committed to serving the Maryland market, drawing upon our vast knowledge and long history advising clients throughout the state,” said Paul A. Tiburzi, managing partner of the firm’s Baltimore office. “Guy has spent his entire career at DLA Piper and over the past 19 years has proven to be an exceptional lawyer with a deep commitment to Baltimore and the greater Maryland community. We are pleased and proud that he is taking on this new leadership role in Maryland.”

DLA Piper’s Maryland Real Estate practice comprises all core and ancillary real estate services, including acquisitions and sales, joint ventures, tax planning, development, land use and government relations, leasing, finance, investment, restructuring and workouts, construction, and environmental matters. The practice represents investors, pension funds, REITs, developers, lenders, borrowers, and other public and private business entities. It has consistently earned a top-tier ranking among Maryland real estate practices by Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business each year since 2005.

Flynn represents parties in all areas of commercial real estate investment, development, leasing and finance. He has been continuously recognized as a leader in commercial real estate law by Chambers USA based on his extensive experience with high-end real estate development and finance matters, tax issues and investment structures, as well as his involvement in numerous high-profile and high-value transactions throughout Maryland.

Active in Baltimore’s business and civic community, Flynn was appointed by Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake to serve on the newly reconstituted Baltimore City Board of Ethics in June 2010 and was elected to serve on the Board of Governors of The Center Club, Baltimore's premier business club, in September 2012. He is a member of numerous civic and charitable organizations.

On November 3, 2012 three days before the presidential election, The Multi-Cultural Prayer Movement presents “The Wake Up,” a FREE event that aims to will bring together Christians from all over the Mid-Atlantic region to pray, worship and take action! Taking place at the War Memorial Plaza on the corner of N. Gay and Fayette St. in Baltimore across from City Hall from noon to 4:00 p.m., thousands of youth and adults alike will gather from across the Mid-Atlantic region including: Washington, D.C., Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, New York for individual, group and corporate prayer and intercession for America. This event is not a protest, festival or rally! Nor is it a time for speeches or sermons. Join the multi-cultural, multi-ethnic and multi-denominational prayer movement, as we respond in prayer, praise and worship; gathering in a corporate expression of humility to determine the future for generations to come. Believing in the power of prayer, worship and action!

Presidential debates on international affairs almost always invoke a lot of tough talk, and Monday’s was no exception as Barack Obama and Mitt Romney used the topic of Iran to burnish their macho credentials.

  Negotiating directly with Tehran does not sound tough, which may be why both candidates evaded it when the subject came up. However, direct United States-Iran talks must at least be attempted before war becomes the only remaining option to halt Iran’s quest for bomb-grade nuclear material.

  The New York Times reported Sunday that Iran and the United States had agreed to direct negotiations. This would mark a bold and potentially perilous move by the Obama administration, which says the report is not true.

  Former Bush administration officials say direct negotiations make sense. We agree.

The regional consequences of a war with Iran would be horrific. Iran’s proxies would surge forth to cause mayhem. Oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz would probably shut down, leading to shortages and global economic catastrophe. There is no guarantee that other nuclear powers, such as India, Pakistan, China and Russia, would support the United States. A broader international conflict of world-war proportions isn’t hard to envision.

  So, yes, the two absolutely should talk directly. We must move deliberately and strategically. We cannot allow our direct conversations to be misinterpreted by Tehran as a signal that our resolve and that of our allies to inflict unprecedented harsh economic sanctions has diminished. Nor can negotiations become another tool for Iran to keep stalling as it proceeds with bomb-capable enrichment activities.

  Direct talks must establish unequivocally that international sanctions will only get worse if Iran doesn’t show immediate and full compliance with all United Nations resolutions and its signed commitment to the 1970 Nonproliferation Treaty. Enrichment efforts and nuclear-capable ballistic missile development must cease, as the Security Council requires.

  Being clear and direct also ramps down questions about the commitment the United States has to our closest ally in the region, Israel. Despite the attempts of some to make this relationship a political football, the bond that exists between our nation and Israel can never be compromised. Any threat to Israel is essentially an attack on the United States, and direct talks with Iran do not and could never threaten that relationship.

  Going forward, it is crucial that the United States establish a clear timetable of compliance, and until Iran complies— sanctions will not ease. Iran must have no doubt that its currency crisis, inflation, worsening shortages and rising domestic

political tensions are only a taste of the pain to come. The talks should establish that Iran’s only hope of avoiding more of the same— and possibly war— is to stop stalling and to start complying.

  Direct talks can and should help rebuild trust and defuse the rising tensions. The Bush administration tried direct talks before, in 2007. Yet relations wound up only getting worse, in large part because Iran failed to honor its commitments. This time, the onus must be on Iran to demonstrate transparency, goodwill and a genuine desire to avoid war.

This week’s presidential debate once again highlighted the importance of women in today’s political culture.

In politics, where there are more men than women in elected positions, it is easy to get the impression that men matter most.