Debating the debates
Raynard Jackson | 9/25/2015, 6 a.m.
Every time I think the media has sunk below the point of no return on the scale of embarrassment; they prove to the world that there is truly no floor for how low they can go.
Of course I am talking about last week’s Republican presidential debate hosted by the Comedy News Network (CNN). The on air talent did not try to hide the fact that their stated goal, individually and as a supposed news outlet, was to get the candidates to attack each other personally.
Both the preliminary and main debates each spent the first 20 minutes or so talking exclusively about Donald Trump; not about the policy positions of Trump, but rather about some personal comment he made about one of the candidates.
For CNN, the debates were all about theatrics and “gotcha” moments; it was all about ratings and ultimately money by selling advertising during the debates.
During future presidential elections, all debates, both Republican and Democrat, should be hosted by C-SPAN where they are known to make the on air talent as invisible as possible. Debates should be about the issues that are affecting the American people, not all the sideshows that the media are interested in promoting.
Most of the elite media, with its openly liberal bias, makes these debates about them and their networks, not about the American people.
I am also very amazed and amused by the elite media’s constant lecturing about diversity— see actor Matt Damon lecturing black film producer Effie Brown about the lack of diversity in Hollywood— and yet they rarely display it when given the opportunity.
Why does the media and both the Republican and Democratic Party continue to ignore the more than 200-black owned newspapers in the U.S.? To my knowledge, there has never been a reporter from a black newspaper asked to be part of a presidential debate by either party.
CNN and FOX News think so little of their own black on air talent that they made a conscious decision to go with their default position— all white!
I also put the blame on the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ). I don’t know why they have not made a public fuss about the lack of diversity in these presidential debates. I am not a journalist, I am a columnist, but yet I spend more time advocating for their members than they do— go figure.
We have had two Republican debates, yet not one question about how amnesty for illegals would further decimate the black community; not one question about “specific” Republican solutions to the high black unemployment rate under Obama; not one question about how Obama’s policies have devastated Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs); not one question about “specific” Republican solutions to the shrinking percentage of loans from the Small Business Administration (SBA) to black businesses going from 8 percent under Bush to 1.8 percent under Obama.
Do you really think a white reporter is even aware of these indices affecting the black community or even care about them? This is why diversity is important; it makes you aware of things that normally would be of no consequence to you simply because you have no direct connection to the issue.